{"id":"W3186885181","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111312","title":"Resilient cooling strategies – A critical review and qualitative assessment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Energy and Buildings","topic":"Building Energy and Comfort Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Concordia University","funders":"Energiteknologisk udviklings- og demonstrationsprogram; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Resilience (materials science); Passive cooling; Building envelope; Architectural engineering; Environmental science; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability engineering; Engineering; Meteorology; Thermal; Business; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002723458,0.001441808,0.001811305,0.005590948,0.0004621514,0.001884083,0.001600318,0.001452215,0.003472319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005653705,0.0006752267,0.001387415,0.00569917,0.000893358,0.002690598,0.0008891086,0.001250895,0.0006950519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001729671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004255943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003282693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004642881,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988903,0.0003246061,0.000232929,0.0001579115,0.0003229744,0.00007136649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958699,0.003017907,0.000330975,0.00007744384,0.0006510591,0.00005265892],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001377319,0.0001362003,0.0003396796,0.2531668,0.0004883282,0.0001932399,0.0005407957,0.002381776,0.001359481,0.02062438,0.01733858,0.7032929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002287448,0.0003079159,0.001527733,0.1572402,0.001458058,0.0006623955,0.0007093615,0.0006783942,0.001399827,0.007101744,0.828815,0.00007648212],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002272867,0.9982192,0.0003209927,0.0002452659,0.00009574981,0.00002327855,0.00002976676,0.000004347489,0.0008339676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002022539,0.997099,0.0004608881,0.0001591672,0.00005811496,0.00002707472,0.0000314792,0.000002174877,0.0001395621],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005590948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01440316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03542427567520216,"score_gpt":0.3668045971334726,"score_spread":0.3313803214582704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}