{"id":"W3187321486","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105258","title":"Find extra options or reason badly: An investigation of children’s reasoning with incompatibility statements","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"KU Leuven","keywords":"Fallacy; Psychology; Dilemma; Premise; Cognition; Sample (material); Statement (logic); Social psychology; Deception; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007189556,0.0007885123,0.0008152219,0.001681872,0.001262578,0.0041387,0.001612518,0.002200848,0.005919551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07270496,0.001292623,0.0008653447,0.00158538,0.003951563,0.006370627,0.002672631,0.004336873,0.0008378034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00141665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001943294,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006671544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006755841,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994927,0.001430471,0.0007459916,0.0007854042,0.00169618,0.0004149053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8848603,0.08968945,0.01513419,0.005290712,0.003688817,0.00133656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002674111,0.003191894,0.5463843,0.001005345,0.0003623251,0.009637198,0.3118189,0.00393763,0.03441297,0.03534377,0.003285076,0.04794648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007410595,0.002394792,0.6206272,0.0007235499,0.000700846,0.01887597,0.2097102,0.02070819,0.04287266,0.05004044,0.03206975,0.0005352838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929879,0.00008259909,0.0006239008,0.0001848068,0.000007049504,0.00003424475,0.0001022131,0.00001984834,0.005957361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959269,0.0001389473,0.002082798,0.0001004948,0.00000615524,0.0000735727,0.0002502432,0.00003602655,0.001384786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007189556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03802246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03947734728376945,"score_gpt":0.3877371447373793,"score_spread":0.3482597974536099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}