{"id":"W3187399771","doi":"10.1155/2021/8157293","title":"The Analysis of Driver’s Recognition Time of Different Traffic Sign Combinations on Urban Roads via Driving Simulation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Safety Warnings and Signage","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Traffic sign recognition; Sign (mathematics); Traffic sign; Computer science; Regression analysis; Advanced driver assistance systems; Pattern recognition (psychology); Artificial intelligence; Simulation; Machine learning; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002454937,0.0001056702,0.0003469212,0.0002808286,0.00008650954,0.000007821199,0.00008561219,0.00006704776,0.0002439349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000588411,0.00008415768,0.0003283408,0.000618303,0.00003890348,0.0001464537,0.000001125392,0.0001652196,0.000002674685],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000380067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002305254,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001864999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003716254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984646,0.000150879,0.0008228805,0.0001266035,0.0003244087,0.0001106123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974796,0.0006829238,0.001101349,0.0001392272,0.0005553361,0.00004153785],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004105259,0.0007152039,0.004025687,0.00001426132,0.001335409,0.00001491086,0.01056752,0.8730658,0.03405789,0.000395837,0.00002118577,0.07537574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00150643,0.000424661,0.9833013,0.00008768391,0.001398837,0.000001413134,0.001340232,0.008635856,0.002543385,0.000594777,0.00006256478,0.0001027987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843709,0.000129051,0.01490762,0.0001108985,0.0002495631,0.0001007158,0.0000185211,0.000007845441,0.0001048226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994272,0.00004700386,0.0002151948,0.00001448643,0.00003064912,0.000003049546,0.00015377,0.00001184217,0.00009682588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9792757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.343185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01309797090399122,"score_gpt":0.2826849784219115,"score_spread":0.2695870075179203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}