{"id":"W3192391930","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102508","title":"Co-production of risk knowledge and improvement of risk communication: A three-legged stool","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Disaster risk reduction; Narrative; Knowledge management; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Production (economics); Business; Risk communication; Reduction (mathematics); Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Environmental resource management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01278893,0.001128553,0.0008966031,0.001352837,0.003671058,0.005994476,0.0021385,0.005084227,0.01897746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02162468,0.0005688014,0.0009640428,0.0006630421,0.001974498,0.006924767,0.01259469,0.003761152,0.002917544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001653477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00838584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001964617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003450723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934284,0.003817616,0.0003238697,0.0006767344,0.0009205702,0.0008327627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98136,0.005795813,0.0008588538,0.001958691,0.002562338,0.007464386],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002042602,0.008518515,0.01154562,0.001614813,0.0002934102,0.001382097,0.006300951,0.002160237,0.008081567,0.01778101,0.06423967,0.8760395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005499667,0.03674996,0.04875015,0.0134787,0.0009782724,0.00453854,0.0576582,0.04295579,0.02254931,0.2018242,0.5636234,0.001393869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.393872,0.008504655,0.1989656,0.3042541,0.02425081,0.004742727,0.0005644306,0.002496752,0.062349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6460539,0.003422225,0.2986182,0.02188324,0.001233714,0.00114396,0.0003920459,0.0002708138,0.02698193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06763518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01531795547958915,"score_gpt":0.3200538868394064,"score_spread":0.3047359313598173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}