{"id":"W3192536756","doi":"","title":"Translation of Hedges in Medical Databases to Other Platforms’ Syntax May Cause Significantly Different Search Results. A Review of: Bradley, S. M. (2010). Examination of the clinical queries and systematic review “hedges” in EMBASE and MEDLINE. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 31, 27-37.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Syntax; Computer science; Translation (biology); Linguistics; Database; Natural language processing; Programming language; Information retrieval; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1916491,0.002109215,0.006112158,0.03653938,0.001597194,0.01017794,0.002841572,0.002640549,0.02549047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5760561,0.002263472,0.007874389,0.04541545,0.002844037,0.00977012,0.006383123,0.002180482,0.005764937],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006420171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01453858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00357636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009535146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.689818,0.1523634,0.1259746,0.007667183,0.0228336,0.001343319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.314804,0.5822651,0.04489789,0.01982211,0.03749042,0.0007204245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002291777,0.00009289756,0.006120887,0.5918968,0.01095309,0.0006034295,0.009876151,0.0005647193,0.003784169,0.02751071,0.1185908,0.2277145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002103779,0.0007527439,0.02751307,0.3062747,0.01835467,0.001676636,0.008593875,0.001644424,0.005915935,0.04374638,0.5826132,0.0008106168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05039008,0.4776038,0.1050249,0.1047736,0.02259754,0.03163655,0.1563088,0.003986802,0.04767803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2285959,0.1634222,0.4203376,0.04724498,0.003634767,0.07438086,0.05152266,0.002632433,0.008228564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8083509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6438254078933469,"score_gpt":0.6355246666148647,"score_spread":0.008300741278482127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}