{"id":"W3192597289","doi":"10.1017/pds.2021.479","title":"MODELLING DESIGN TRADE-OFFS USING A SET THEORY APPROACH: ALTERNATIVE PATHS FOR NAVIGATING TRADE-OFF SITUATIONS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Design Society","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Conceptual design; Pareto principle; Space (punctuation); Set (abstract data type); Process (computing); Framing (construction); Spatial design; Engineering design process; Management science; Industrial engineering; Mathematical optimization; Human–computer interaction; Mathematics; Engineering; Business; Marketing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001591256,0.000259836,0.0002831487,0.00002274043,0.0003791015,0.0001330978,0.0003566823,0.0001518553,0.000009835418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002735659,0.0002357964,0.0003362546,0.0005035991,0.00008118947,0.0005337567,0.00003735557,0.000444286,9.375364e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000157162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001464842,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002665482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.476144e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998538,0.0000802921,0.0004152566,0.0003206864,0.0002937236,0.0003520481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998382,0.0009505284,0.0002459676,0.0001473752,0.0001910745,0.00008310345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003201309,0.0001149919,0.000009568937,0.000343465,0.000332268,1.792555e-7,0.04343425,0.8351262,0.1088717,0.004665331,0.003920125,0.003149924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003302542,0.00001858272,0.000003738278,0.000123286,0.0001877212,0.00002443633,0.01001924,0.8986201,0.07929318,0.01082561,0.0003065815,0.0002473297],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008919942,0.0006076471,0.9882796,0.0003669891,0.0002577064,0.000838627,0.00002105156,0.000145487,0.0005628969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5016718,0.0001400221,0.4975957,0.0001658282,0.0001673756,0.0001188793,0.000006693343,0.00007125523,0.00006241134],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4927519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9615499,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1012251252190235,"score_gpt":0.2958015457803621,"score_spread":0.1945764205613386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}