{"id":"W3193150665","doi":"10.1029/2020jb020562","title":"Three‐Dimensional Inversion of Magnetotelluric Data for a Resistivity Model With Arbitrary Anisotropy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth","topic":"Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"China Scholarship Council; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Anisotropy; Magnetotellurics; Isotropy; Inversion (geology); Electrical resistivity and conductivity; Geology; Geophysics; Synthetic data; Algorithm; Physics; Computer science; Optics; Seismology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004440854,0.000418275,0.0002372635,0.0003566922,0.0002146328,0.0004871998,0.0003567328,0.0003826071,0.0003488679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001193214,0.0001985415,0.0004575634,0.0005229713,0.0002963515,0.0003835083,0.0002756726,0.0004236892,0.0001046764],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003761472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006127715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008091533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006373166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998994,0.00003028797,0.00000729352,0.000019055,0.00003201754,0.00001198273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997036,0.0001184557,0.0000362701,0.00004956401,0.00007382142,0.00001841871],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008680761,0.00005004376,0.005860182,0.00004060915,0.00004247855,0.0001592793,0.00009224306,0.9377303,0.03400176,0.00181156,0.0004120372,0.01971266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006722974,0.000006858293,0.0008763521,0.0000015574,0.000002988384,0.00001560536,0.00001074096,0.9958487,0.002813934,0.0002133558,0.0001965286,0.000006738476],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.7229101,0.00007444349,0.2735051,0.0002182891,0.00002704601,0.00002955447,0.0003252197,0.0008177161,0.002092446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558865,0.00002634538,0.04356932,0.00001753883,0.000005477958,0.00001303569,0.000212343,0.00003219258,0.000237302],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008091533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0160889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09440622602076437,"score_gpt":0.3444684662570551,"score_spread":0.2500622402362908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}