{"id":"W3194034373","doi":"10.2217/3dp-2021-0005","title":"Evaluation of 3D-Printer Settings for Producing Personal Protective Equipment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine","topic":"Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Technation Canada; Canada Research Chairs; University of Victoria","keywords":"Infill; Materials science; Ultimate tensile strength; Economic shortage; Shell (structure); Shield; Composite material; Line (geometry); 3D printing; Structural engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Geology; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001491828,0.000672085,0.000221447,0.0006393398,0.0002887091,0.0006323378,0.0006002788,0.0004033723,0.002973805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005500106,0.0003065931,0.0004247078,0.0003076504,0.0002525893,0.0005866648,0.0005511572,0.0002860141,0.0004794126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004332604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003214322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004440598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008569072,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978676,0.0005970531,0.0002028676,0.0002113672,0.001015401,0.0001057929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956933,0.002119932,0.0009788658,0.0002369856,0.0007681912,0.0002027937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005122941,0.002984279,0.0620761,0.001293158,0.0001300807,0.0008796558,0.0008235381,0.004934196,0.7871661,0.0001607297,0.0003968368,0.1340325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001842959,0.02299343,0.1744455,0.0001394114,0.000323807,0.002225938,0.000694403,0.009095113,0.7863704,0.0001491889,0.003291788,0.00008678083],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957309,0.0003208149,0.002876494,0.00001933632,0.00001246175,0.00009681743,0.00009425016,0.0000425543,0.0008063646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814119,0.0002818497,0.01731749,0.00002845869,0.00001097637,0.00009466693,0.0001378874,0.00002686523,0.0006899515],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002973805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009948313,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03911772377877955,"score_gpt":0.3012644849681035,"score_spread":0.262146761189324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}