{"id":"W3194619832","doi":"10.2166/wp.2021.054","title":"How is water security conceptualized and practiced for rural livelihoods in the global South? A systematic scoping review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Policy","topic":"Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Livelihood; Water security; Context (archaeology); Food security; Agriculture; Business; Scholarship; Environmental planning; Economic growth; Environmental resource management; Water resources; Political science; Geography; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01839312,0.001011641,0.00313371,0.01584578,0.001142206,0.005965981,0.001486709,0.002373498,0.002540309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06566028,0.0009612537,0.003215434,0.0143723,0.002766029,0.006101878,0.002788262,0.001821759,0.0002600647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006008822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02448974,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01818662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02983002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901953,0.004356088,0.002697252,0.0008789333,0.001540303,0.0003321057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593709,0.03113573,0.004563685,0.0007399407,0.003872015,0.0003177404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001127405,0.00004019413,0.004065474,0.7776699,0.002626663,0.0002504765,0.008186501,0.0004594099,0.0002887911,0.01010695,0.004817018,0.1913758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002186178,0.00006448469,0.004327352,0.9548835,0.004071552,0.0002178244,0.00553856,0.00013301,0.0001333417,0.001481838,0.02909394,0.00003273777],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003936755,0.9920718,0.000556241,0.001550258,0.0002591781,0.000284583,0.0002218375,0.000005730354,0.001113609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03716118,0.9601199,0.0009581321,0.0008436376,0.00008065272,0.0005303547,0.0001672447,0.000005900035,0.0001330112],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01839312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09727323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02321047332204091,"score_gpt":0.2984175196758886,"score_spread":0.2752070463538477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}