{"id":"W3194739923","doi":"10.1007/s11239-021-02463-x","title":"Safety and effectiveness of dabigatran in routine clinical practice: the RE-COVERY DVT/PE study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","topic":"Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada)","funders":"Boehringer Ingelheim","keywords":"Medicine; Dabigatran; Hazard ratio; Internal medicine; Propensity score matching; Confidence interval; Pulmonary embolism; Vitamin K antagonist; Deep vein; Incidence (geometry); Warfarin; Venous thrombosis; Atrial fibrillation; Thrombosis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002617708,0.0005516147,0.001514336,0.0009783496,0.0003706151,0.001674054,0.0004480774,0.001284336,0.001410291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01527307,0.0003953337,0.001635123,0.001244757,0.00067695,0.0009703111,0.0005713236,0.001178606,0.0003500165],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009017645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001025976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001645116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001946449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965698,0.001406034,0.0005478562,0.0004858425,0.0008019802,0.0001883814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849534,0.005192329,0.006424598,0.00131095,0.0009450372,0.001173533],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.09311281,0.001682292,0.847155,0.00074933,0.00590408,0.0003582859,0.0004930562,0.0004008546,0.001216647,0.0002078956,0.0006905067,0.04802939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009119955,0.02258104,0.9586127,0.0002224339,0.004253826,0.001015843,0.0003785215,0.0009109038,0.0007286324,0.000228174,0.001869909,0.00007812589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937669,0.004442362,0.00007422327,0.0001944109,0.00002968275,0.00005547357,0.0004133538,0.00000694363,0.001016552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976048,0.001354027,0.0001383579,0.000168852,0.00008389808,0.00003198763,0.0004176998,0.000003789054,0.0001965392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002617708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01384389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03787884307996219,"score_gpt":0.3807837630427532,"score_spread":0.342904919962791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}