{"id":"W3195113965","doi":"","title":"CASE COMMENT - COMMENTAIRE D'ARRET - THE INTERPRETATION OF BIJURAL OR HARMONIZED FEDERAL LEGISLATION: SCHREIBER V. CANADA (A.G.)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Statutory interpretation; Law; Supreme court; Philosophy; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003481219,0.0005589465,0.0006174571,0.001189465,0.02088992,0.005376389,0.00257261,0.02129943,0.01047539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008966697,0.0006316213,0.001147738,0.00146594,0.005748197,0.001992292,0.002310827,0.01602824,0.001531195],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03158885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04063641,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9302911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946407,0.0005413998,0.0001678895,0.0006639223,0.002123484,0.001862512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978618,0.0008138536,0.0001084112,0.00005904967,0.0008448997,0.0003119565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009685355,0.00004006228,0.002889611,0.000137457,0.0000293091,0.00386293,0.01073914,0.000316031,0.001073045,0.2682551,0.7052412,0.007319258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004330176,0.00003213075,0.005014234,0.0003016564,0.00007698891,0.001146352,0.01081051,0.0004055151,0.001181453,0.01002956,0.9708266,0.0001316926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03541441,0.004221877,0.002842427,0.5697684,0.006585625,0.0004858611,0.001361463,0.0002046319,0.3791153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1747766,0.002035451,0.001671746,0.5616241,0.001091891,0.0002105161,0.0002266898,0.0001333501,0.2582297],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06970888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2291942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0369139040054882,"score_gpt":0.2618630038610211,"score_spread":0.2249490998555329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}