{"id":"W3196651021","doi":"10.5167/uzh-205562","title":"Evaluating deliberative competence: a simple method with an application to financial choice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Statistic; Competence (human resources); Scope (computer science); Quality (philosophy); Psychological intervention; Actuarial science; Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Risk analysis (engineering); Management science; Psychology; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Social psychology; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02430634,0.001327211,0.001445808,0.003853474,0.0009926911,0.00265086,0.00189362,0.002273572,0.01153414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1465587,0.0006846801,0.001601091,0.003534711,0.004686079,0.004255553,0.004277221,0.003259094,0.001370867],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001342155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002113151,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001384613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001680446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.973125,0.02018246,0.001258727,0.001867355,0.003345222,0.0002211912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8479818,0.1279888,0.005785082,0.01248389,0.004721624,0.001038861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007161705,0.001042898,0.01467237,0.001383132,0.0005805381,0.0002450501,0.002402324,0.02625352,0.007260323,0.4120881,0.005530349,0.5278252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004166974,0.001092487,0.009129175,0.0003992188,0.0001812989,0.0004128924,0.0004487471,0.1981637,0.006007761,0.7668448,0.01659002,0.0003132349],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005283049,0.00008682064,0.9910684,0.0003128235,0.00004072319,0.0006119665,0.0001858136,0.0002420133,0.002168377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08280505,0.0001147565,0.9128166,0.0001381271,0.00004699547,0.002924158,0.0001000865,0.00009190077,0.0009622364],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02430634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1285458,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.108567547751666,"score_gpt":0.4193126799082066,"score_spread":0.3107451321565407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}