{"id":"W3198890959","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103559","title":"Using flow disruptions to understand healthcare system safety: A systematic review of observational studies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Applied Ergonomics","topic":"Patient Safety and Medication Errors","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Observational study; Systematic review; Health care; Observational methods in psychology; Data collection; Data science; Medicine; MEDLINE; Computer science; Management science; Engineering; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001866573,0.0004794669,0.005278551,0.0002209745,0.0006421984,0.000001985588,0.0003724378,0.0004105544,0.00002978334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007716271,0.0004046486,0.0004599428,0.0008076431,0.00006771056,0.00005173073,0.0002761274,0.0006377608,0.0001487956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003286013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003023666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000109463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003561214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937562,0.0009954048,0.003829277,0.0005546311,0.0003933449,0.000471143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936619,0.001698333,0.002907792,0.0009713229,0.0004881417,0.0002725509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007864265,0.00002078809,7.609227e-7,0.9514907,0.0004878573,9.600762e-7,0.000979144,0.00005819741,2.888119e-8,0.0445973,0.0005579172,0.001798491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001331637,0.0000107138,0.00000103633,0.8287386,0.002320536,0.000005198644,0.007807373,0.00003183633,1.599506e-8,0.00001745723,0.1606702,0.000263818],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001013387,0.980558,0.007935154,0.0004143972,0.001076419,0.008793198,0.0007508801,0.00007033432,0.0004005512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00001259848,0.991473,0.003987066,0.001359951,0.0002020351,0.001503522,0.001225433,0.00007821871,0.0001581969],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1601123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998406,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5433702786438195,"score_gpt":0.5393401300598597,"score_spread":0.004030148583959781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}