{"id":"W32004288","doi":"10.1364/ol.385246","title":"An Intersectional Analysis of the Female Postsecondary Advantage: Gender, race, and College Selectivity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Optics Letters","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Innovation Group of Jinan; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Higher education; Race (biology); Psychology; Postsecondary education; Medical education; Demography; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Medicine; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004376893,0.00008635163,0.0001625993,0.0006369845,0.0002918099,0.0004075381,0.0002707258,0.0001967724,0.00623166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002068136,0.0000480942,0.0001742221,0.0004963698,0.0004294731,0.0003704938,0.0005407597,0.0002659659,0.0002466883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002208343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002326673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002725609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00320049,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998703,0.00003165704,0.000002892218,0.00002971488,0.00002368621,0.00004179012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984876,0.0007385208,0.0003156941,0.000128869,0.0001154661,0.0002138209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006773305,0.0001181654,0.883241,0.00002388154,0.0001415067,0.0005773975,0.00134222,0.002858408,0.02023303,0.04489635,0.0005096783,0.04538098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001045272,0.0001946412,0.957913,0.00001015547,0.00007993302,0.000547222,0.001373917,0.02211552,0.003105843,0.01362549,0.001003364,0.00002035996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960873,0.00004357392,0.001192649,0.00006203867,0.00000121585,0.000001006949,0.00003258112,0.000003295174,0.002576328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996901,0.000008027712,0.00008401711,0.000003535994,0.000002089464,6.645976e-7,0.000008650056,0.000001172629,0.0002017183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00623166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02084702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01653194257717071,"score_gpt":0.3398947953679387,"score_spread":0.3233628527907679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}