{"id":"W3200589665","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.016","title":"Commentary on controversy and debate 4 paper series: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Series (stratigraphy); Probabilistic logic; Relative risk; Meta-analysis; Point (geometry); Systematic review; Resource (disambiguation); Odds ratio; Cochrane collaboration; MEDLINE; Medicine; Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Confidence interval; Biology; Cochrane Library; Pathology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07782383,0.002035045,0.005918103,0.004974692,0.00752379,0.01087172,0.01078844,0.153765,0.01045922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3969973,0.002900999,0.005724721,0.005565783,0.01337059,0.01051966,0.005995301,0.1078333,0.01108051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01433692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01717733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01220505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01336958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9167064,0.03682191,0.01330734,0.008768085,0.02101133,0.003384937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5794611,0.3309311,0.01822021,0.009522928,0.04839918,0.01346551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001296143,0.00001661144,0.0003662815,0.0001985924,0.0001158229,0.0003170448,0.0001902366,0.00004105571,0.00005913691,0.003934592,0.9907842,0.003846772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001479668,0.0001354784,0.001938912,0.004852393,0.0009034079,0.001425861,0.001005405,0.001109623,0.0006016554,0.05744351,0.9287857,0.0003183666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006342887,0.0009661604,0.00008621276,0.9672092,0.03117709,0.000009482929,0.00006034317,0.00001058701,0.0004174646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001004231,0.0003655525,0.0002796717,0.9408082,0.05692295,0.00004664921,0.00002042142,0.00002435303,0.0005280647],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9221762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4115766,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9036224762763756,"score_gpt":0.6843450714432695,"score_spread":0.2192774048331061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}