{"id":"W3202975912","doi":"10.1002/zamm.202100297","title":"New solutions for an Eshelby inclusion of arbitrary shape in a plane or two jointed half‐planes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik","topic":"Composite Material Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Conformal map; Plane (geometry); Mathematics; Geometry; Unit (ring theory); Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical analysis; Stress (linguistics); Function (biology); Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001224554,0.0005221468,0.001276088,0.0004771371,0.0001928367,0.0001179277,0.0004456832,0.0002693092,0.0001420852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009830473,0.0004547302,0.0001706865,0.0004317818,0.00001695193,0.0002632547,0.0004571099,0.0003893948,0.000003438982],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003991395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002604101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001108294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001667553,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969057,0.00003028542,0.001569138,0.0003376773,0.0005435045,0.0006137078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979478,0.0003292326,0.0006183752,0.0004702454,0.0002712571,0.0003631398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002219679,0.0002882045,2.831868e-8,0.001246728,0.0001472383,0.00005293828,0.001978965,0.0002303455,0.5482413,0.444587,0.0001078402,0.002897504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003798456,0.0007074623,1.469225e-7,0.001112191,0.000372983,0.0009389367,0.001539962,0.1173375,0.6098685,0.2626304,0.001131401,0.0005620795],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1057089,0.001937037,0.8875302,0.0001314031,0.001065821,0.001480647,0.0001558843,0.0001977528,0.001792374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4818518,0.0009890543,0.5163678,0.00008209408,0.000318913,0.00004774698,0.00006973548,0.0002297418,0.00004314696],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3761429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02334520129412874,"score_gpt":0.2663214152771787,"score_spread":0.2429762139830499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}