{"id":"W320344990","doi":"","title":"Regulatory paradox: A review of enforcement letters issued by the office for human research protection","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Deliberation; Agency (philosophy); Bioethics; Political science; Common Rule; Beneficence; Commission; Sanctions; Autonomy; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Informed consent; Medicine; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08114111,0.001064294,0.002048816,0.01474711,0.007071331,0.01437791,0.006434593,0.02535752,0.006644719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3089445,0.001638135,0.002460019,0.0171637,0.01067612,0.009995214,0.003588544,0.01999354,0.002624334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02096155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06290691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02839321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02873513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9133614,0.02486747,0.01304488,0.007338742,0.03772236,0.003665192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5948891,0.3055258,0.02148937,0.005779141,0.06828184,0.004034732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005805606,0.00007028423,0.0007810718,0.003869809,0.00004754802,0.0007646676,0.001570058,0.0001321819,0.0001163942,0.02867744,0.8232583,0.1406542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002659021,0.00004080926,0.001710334,0.01320885,0.00005379445,0.0006057922,0.001064036,0.0001065668,0.0001119637,0.003970479,0.9790465,0.00005439867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001403982,0.3236069,0.001172837,0.6237109,0.0311889,0.0001428049,0.0004109823,0.0001049488,0.01825765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01951331,0.2217475,0.002442288,0.718364,0.02831694,0.0003552127,0.0004559682,0.0002044306,0.008600379],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9746425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4291203,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4695930890292708,"score_gpt":0.5187027224996658,"score_spread":0.04910963347039499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}