{"id":"W3203526704","doi":"","title":"The Boundaries of Judicial Review Since Highwood Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v. Wall","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Ambiguity; Political science; Criticism; Judicial review; High Court; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0442661,0.0002444567,0.0006197852,0.001865871,0.01638303,0.0213926,0.002642095,0.01280287,0.001493375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1103521,0.00115376,0.0006957345,0.001506312,0.02145674,0.008501361,0.006492276,0.01948402,0.000361],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04089597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07651671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2956496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5736584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9508411,0.0153819,0.002930069,0.006085039,0.01421263,0.01054926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8884042,0.05958363,0.0071099,0.006186423,0.0281961,0.01051979],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001476756,0.00004980808,0.007424597,0.0002312712,0.00005996404,0.0009771447,0.02110643,0.0004857386,0.00133674,0.822427,0.08797671,0.05777685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001202287,0.0001749747,0.04688719,0.002432302,0.000128773,0.0006610122,0.01993743,0.0007266712,0.003309046,0.09549208,0.8296647,0.0004655987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1298178,0.04375946,0.006920941,0.4806347,0.00498212,0.0003070038,0.0003340057,0.0001155119,0.3331285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8647577,0.004451743,0.003423761,0.09908585,0.001537337,0.0001833471,0.0001172305,0.00008349032,0.0263596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2956496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5878574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01724933141685455,"score_gpt":0.3126693933389262,"score_spread":0.2954200619220717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}