{"id":"W3203676369","doi":"10.1002/smj.3342","title":"Thriving on contradiction: Toward a dialectical alternative to <scp>fit‐based</scp> models in strategy (and beyond)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Thriving; Contradiction; Competitive advantage; Economics; Strategic management; Dialectic; Creativity; Organizational culture; Process (computing); Business model; Industrial organization; Sociology; Marketing; Business; Management; Computer science; Epistemology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01713716,0.0008375596,0.0007340348,0.004142638,0.004111958,0.01781731,0.003217638,0.004605817,0.003302529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01290741,0.0005895824,0.001108735,0.003100932,0.04967267,0.01925298,0.00750377,0.007580311,0.0008491445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01078286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008926823,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003559413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003221665,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9855195,0.01100422,0.0004405727,0.0009047796,0.00158892,0.000542015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857735,0.008303545,0.001335693,0.001797983,0.001880159,0.00090912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005235723,0.00001301226,0.0001231111,0.00002426755,0.000004195862,0.00003113947,0.00493705,0.0004344855,0.00005585639,0.9914328,0.000450921,0.002488001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008953999,0.00001024265,0.00007460162,0.00007250039,0.000004053032,0.00003605593,0.003497384,0.003000534,0.0001174477,0.9822129,0.01095588,0.000009428185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06095882,0.00450509,0.5435016,0.1245254,0.0007000391,0.0002327848,0.0001439722,0.0003691333,0.2650631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.905851,0.001404462,0.08312242,0.003804402,0.0001701486,0.0003872861,0.00008889368,0.0001374338,0.005033844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01781731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09063101,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07297517486705662,"score_gpt":0.278080120706504,"score_spread":0.2051049458394473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}