{"id":"W320397684","doi":"","title":"A Rational Thinking of the People's Mediation System of China/UNE PENSEE RATIONNELLE DU SYSTEME DE LA MEDIATION POPULAIRE DE CHINE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; China; Humanities; Alternative dispute resolution; Social harmony; Sociology; Welfare economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005366003,0.0003574784,0.0003276792,0.001812116,0.003941133,0.00572395,0.001217653,0.001604253,0.007366913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003770232,0.0002434447,0.0007917831,0.001092894,0.01319387,0.00388591,0.002233764,0.001342655,0.0002612135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01271298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009639359,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04594509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01922264,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960839,0.001962719,0.0001649082,0.0004905613,0.0007544833,0.0005433844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986063,0.0004432338,0.0002031445,0.0002205398,0.0003688036,0.0001581466],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009355572,0.00001037251,0.001194092,0.0000189254,0.00001219745,0.0001435542,0.004260534,0.001977108,0.000266161,0.9893767,0.0004708115,0.002260326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001146956,0.00008386731,0.007004871,0.0001271827,0.00007334302,0.0002071119,0.01361876,0.04892123,0.001099967,0.8843747,0.04428826,0.00008602033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5733278,0.001014084,0.08588851,0.01945941,0.0001390678,0.0005565556,0.0001878708,0.0001290813,0.3192977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875619,0.00009743952,0.005736142,0.0001486069,0.00001681203,0.00006850393,0.00002245445,0.000005496417,0.006342561],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04594509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09223962,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006671650982445831,"score_gpt":0.2511180785501751,"score_spread":0.2444464275677293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}