{"id":"W3204915655","doi":"10.33989/2226-4051.2016.14.171611","title":"METHODOLOGICAL RESOURCES FOR UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE STUDY IN TODAY'S CANADA","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aesthetics and Ethics of Pedagogical Action","topic":"Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ukrainian; Government (linguistics); Diaspora; Ethnic group; National identity; First language; Identity (music); Political science; Pedagogy; Public relations; Sociology; Gender studies; Linguistics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05060335,0.0007235224,0.001078307,0.01576998,0.02041724,0.01298876,0.003432113,0.001199042,0.00894795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06352464,0.0008233257,0.0007507442,0.02517386,0.008313809,0.00218034,0.008358853,0.00209124,0.001044068],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1227016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4203938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9264153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9506566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9556706,0.02368439,0.004872332,0.002706189,0.009706672,0.003359888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8856156,0.0343163,0.006000077,0.009679566,0.0586892,0.005699189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003084344,0.0002896097,0.0526237,0.007715021,0.0002745743,0.001566749,0.1730697,0.002206402,0.003223752,0.3642887,0.06554762,0.3288856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004645446,0.00005697998,0.0515007,0.006209246,0.0001731047,0.0003542899,0.1221782,0.001067842,0.00151936,0.01990955,0.7968723,0.0001120205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2138086,0.1248843,0.2056444,0.09054079,0.005016766,0.02381034,0.02774905,0.001555665,0.3069901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5308335,0.04039818,0.3177634,0.009990886,0.0005887179,0.02706325,0.008032953,0.0008252624,0.06450378],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1227016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8902668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4392675422392775,"score_gpt":0.422306735434295,"score_spread":0.01696080680498246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}