{"id":"W3205921576","doi":"10.3390/buildings11100476","title":"Combined Use of Wind-Driven Rain Load and Potential Evaporation to Evaluate Moisture Damage Risk: Case Study on the Parliament Buildings in Ottawa, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Buildings","topic":"Wind and Air Flow Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Environmental science; Moisture; Evaporation; Wind speed; Meteorology; Building envelope; Risk assessment; Computational fluid dynamics; Tower; Environmental engineering; Atmospheric sciences; Engineering; Civil engineering; Geography; Geology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005340977,0.0001750577,0.0002186769,0.00002726211,0.0002360395,0.00005869908,0.0001264938,0.00003470813,0.00008859362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002509768,0.0001309728,0.00003215984,0.0003097441,0.00007641524,0.0001182385,0.000302735,0.0001655763,0.000003942781],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003030809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006967688,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4489845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4954011,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998329,0.0001874075,0.0002779958,0.0003972234,0.0005756713,0.0002327418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999384,0.0001178603,0.0001227538,0.0002577921,0.00003466255,0.00008290682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009085899,0.0005344292,0.9032767,0.00001283186,0.00008329791,0.001890969,0.008450842,0.0330877,0.02696632,0.0000649984,0.02282707,0.002713995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001810046,0.0004905187,0.9744048,0.00007297848,0.00009676793,0.00004818949,0.01076444,0.001792067,0.004158035,0.00007911861,0.005907313,0.0003757224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969236,0.00001440897,0.00002938881,0.002244221,0.00009223514,0.0005672878,0.00002478513,0.000008534939,0.00009557967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989104,0.000007171834,0.0003196703,0.0004826286,0.0000214548,0.00002048312,0.000002029971,0.00001146189,0.0002246453],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07112812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5546848,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01499405856478091,"score_gpt":0.236057401159568,"score_spread":0.221063342594787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}