{"id":"W3206602682","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.210523","title":"Cost–utility analysis of apixaban compared with usual care for primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Apixaban; Medicine; Ambulatory; Intensive care medicine; Quality-adjusted life year; Venous thromboembolism; Cost effectiveness; Ambulatory care; Emergency medicine; Health care; Internal medicine; Warfarin; Risk analysis (engineering); Rivaroxaban","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005042485,0.0009993188,0.001350945,0.001817646,0.0003418358,0.001364968,0.001403293,0.0009119887,0.003433704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01576478,0.0004522307,0.003905077,0.001939174,0.0005557394,0.000776354,0.0008726178,0.001143449,0.0001254927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01163728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00428554,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06460575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0341952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962649,0.002620447,0.0001467876,0.000233826,0.0004003724,0.000333701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929375,0.005193911,0.0006250697,0.0001746931,0.0006906804,0.0003781368],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03296648,0.003042638,0.09040774,0.002149021,0.01187254,0.0007349844,0.0001644345,0.7968928,0.001126296,0.006447448,0.003323198,0.05087246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005800108,0.009665174,0.09105777,0.0004618049,0.007495543,0.0005268412,0.0003672423,0.878264,0.0007478768,0.003478369,0.001981515,0.000153734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795679,0.005325023,0.005577054,0.001049112,0.00007271425,0.0008697496,0.002882111,0.00005830864,0.004597983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969782,0.0003485544,0.001425212,0.00009685203,0.00001383501,0.0001416647,0.0007244545,0.000004373811,0.0002670966],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06460575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1284594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01123596161959523,"score_gpt":0.2627775840541011,"score_spread":0.2515416224345058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}