{"id":"W3206750019","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2110.06464","title":"Data-driven distributionally robust risk parity portfolio optimization","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio optimization; Mathematical optimization; Robust optimization; Risk measure; Minimax; Robustness (evolution); Portfolio; Computer science; Probability distribution; Optimization problem; Coherent risk measure; Ambiguity; Convex optimization; Convexity; Mathematics; Regular polygon; Economics; Finance; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00449303,0.001212979,0.001728555,0.0007581474,0.0003036978,0.002009753,0.001896373,0.001614439,0.002127935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0141026,0.0007489948,0.0009135437,0.0009478113,0.001211007,0.002315802,0.002821814,0.002239508,0.0004933348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009355827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001335111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001028472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006331601,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978092,0.000903576,0.000109618,0.0004248868,0.0006061233,0.0001464817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995679,0.002704586,0.0005661813,0.0004358325,0.000472406,0.0001420808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006024283,0.00003737888,0.0005988611,0.00004793889,0.00004763119,0.00006796694,0.00002619847,0.9484926,0.001232648,0.025923,0.0006694415,0.02279604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006157675,0.00001740321,0.00005895325,0.000003639492,0.000002667269,0.00001225343,0.000002640466,0.9876694,0.0003685844,0.01170838,0.0001460684,0.000003953955],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.008581848,0.00007471962,0.9900349,0.0002187295,0.00001449513,0.00002657617,0.00006171919,0.0001044268,0.0008826237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6666253,0.0002560602,0.3289022,0.0002995441,0.00008355382,0.0002472025,0.0004743749,0.0001772119,0.002934606],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00449303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02376169,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2270377884214844,"score_gpt":0.2724703870139829,"score_spread":0.04543259859249849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}