{"id":"W3206903265","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2006.00363.x","title":"Political uncertainty and stock market returns: evidence from the 1995 Quebec referendum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; HEC Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Stock (firearms); Politics; Economics; Financial economics; Stock market; Political risk; Common stock; Outcome (game theory); Business; Political science; Geography; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009637259,0.0002081328,0.00026189,0.001072814,0.00142226,0.001552051,0.0006331221,0.0006092774,0.004280974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004818214,0.0001240098,0.0002106706,0.002408458,0.0006715738,0.0003836892,0.0005224539,0.000819938,0.0002860664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01739015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006322978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.985187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993973,0.0001022835,0.0000201869,0.00007831128,0.0002490598,0.0001529262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936319,0.001118451,0.002423079,0.0002051458,0.001966991,0.0006544293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003176255,0.0001541903,0.972786,0.00004589851,0.0001686452,0.0003347712,0.001406736,0.001106449,0.0003858287,0.001146355,0.009263892,0.01288358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001026651,0.00001861934,0.995975,0.00001593148,0.00002035472,0.00001455508,0.0005676687,0.0005983844,0.0001122562,0.00003853824,0.00261799,0.00001055067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.986459,0.001349522,0.0001457636,0.001620971,0.00002117625,0.00002078973,0.003203753,0.00001031732,0.007168716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960711,0.0003806119,0.00004986297,0.0001588011,0.00001768299,0.000007021972,0.001144103,0.000003085,0.002167764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01739015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.126175,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1382899828676665,"score_gpt":0.1861010163792877,"score_spread":0.04781103351162119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}