{"id":"W3206903265","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2006.00363.x","title":"Political uncertainty and stock market returns: evidence from the 1995 Quebec referendum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; HEC Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Stock (firearms); Politics; Economics; Financial economics; Stock market; Political risk; Common stock; Outcome (game theory); Business; Political science; Geography; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009794082,0.0003259767,0.0007433657,0.0003297795,0.0002786526,0.0004139583,0.0006392932,0.0002299977,0.0006978965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004651661,0.0003284776,0.0002092114,0.000115724,0.0004096169,0.0007732822,0.0000375927,0.0004483034,0.00002391717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001907632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001195387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9008464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997241,0.00006429736,0.001305081,0.0004769171,0.000002812683,0.0009098433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997157,0.000455857,0.0008373548,0.0004822328,0.00009073952,0.0009767885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004948032,0.000007204808,0.05231709,0.00001499003,0.00006383664,0.00003574636,0.0002106808,0.0001227447,0.000001445224,0.9377202,0.009114962,0.0003416243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004615019,0.0001725479,0.1376922,0.000142281,0.00002836662,0.00008261223,0.0003946656,0.001235517,0.00000767567,0.7834339,0.07590243,0.0004462475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708052,0.004226426,0.00002630222,0.0105569,0.001169989,0.0002251489,0.0008312047,0.000006723646,0.01215214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952592,0.0002947687,0.0002356983,0.001350109,0.001236877,0.0000139952,0.00002205579,0.00004220545,0.001545104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1542863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999167,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1382899828676665,"score_gpt":0.1861010163792877,"score_spread":0.04781103351162119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}