{"id":"W3207540549","doi":"10.1080/10888705.2021.1980727","title":"The Who, Where, and What of Publications in the <i>Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science</i> from 2009 to 2019: A Bibliometric Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Context (archaeology); Bibliometrics; Welfare; Salient; Content analysis; Animal welfare; Social science; Sociology; Political science; History; Computer science; Law; Biology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008878339,0.0004209203,0.001283505,0.110662,0.001183224,0.006262972,0.0007380413,0.0006931865,0.002702532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04710062,0.0002353475,0.001665535,0.1693026,0.000837116,0.005125723,0.002124988,0.0005296887,0.0007237869],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003305337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004059997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008430569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.989498,0.001526335,0.00275846,0.0009021031,0.004700408,0.0006147076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479602,0.02517525,0.01435275,0.001041101,0.01003035,0.00144035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006649542,0.0001424147,0.786074,0.0153628,0.002250701,0.0006296029,0.004113771,0.001034503,0.001636112,0.003116485,0.01938807,0.1655867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005209488,0.0001816165,0.9428669,0.003531102,0.001486855,0.0009898612,0.008743525,0.001452037,0.0009921209,0.001662094,0.03794244,0.00009929581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8129007,0.08294336,0.001437575,0.005682673,0.0003430759,0.0005677399,0.0737876,0.0002136188,0.02212367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292047,0.03852114,0.002874621,0.0003825605,0.0004396323,0.0006062813,0.02607176,0.00006590354,0.001833478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.889338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04695368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01334491618168613,"score_gpt":0.3170096083078018,"score_spread":0.3036646921261156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}