{"id":"W3207892366","doi":"","title":"COST EVALUATION OF PROPOSED DECOMMISSIONING PLAN OF CANDU REACTOR","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuclear decommissioning; Plan (archaeology); Nuclear engineering; Environmental science; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Waste management; Engineering; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003362519,0.0002063288,0.0006731288,0.0008398821,0.0002249421,0.0001885209,0.001743518,0.0001301182,0.009139863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001474112,0.0001750118,0.00009779997,0.0008443314,0.0005527029,0.0008831174,0.0005926915,0.0001785981,0.00002012568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001040494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002172434,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005335277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001265145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996972,0.000380621,0.000966157,0.0003336727,0.001071179,0.0002764298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963119,0.0002449348,0.001698071,0.0005246114,0.001103914,0.0001165912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118546,0.0001260967,0.1757013,0.00003752829,0.00006374464,0.000001156937,0.0004583792,0.00001603625,0.8068461,0.0000885191,0.009482147,0.007060512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005989478,0.00002832874,0.4452409,0.0002641671,0.0000964338,0.000004507746,0.0002970596,0.0001660419,0.5487252,0.002031256,0.002375635,0.0001714855],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929683,0.002446041,0.00005112563,0.0001143774,0.0005463249,0.0006610382,0.00007757021,0.00004333292,0.003091864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986005,0.0005856356,0.0006097652,0.00004018719,0.00007530794,0.00002137214,0.000005716601,0.00002900137,0.00003253212],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2695396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4485849854939868,"score_gpt":0.5870252765893168,"score_spread":0.13844029109533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}