{"id":"W3208642700","doi":"10.15353/cjo.v47i4.4461","title":"A Clinical Evaluation of the ALGES™ (hefilcon A) Bifocal Contact Lens","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry","topic":"Ocular Surface and Contact Lens","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contact lens; Optometry; Lens (geology); Pupil; Refraction; Optics; Visual acuity; Subjective refraction; Computer science; Medicine; Refractive error; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009403224,0.0007303858,0.000767428,0.001814098,0.0009281376,0.0003726009,0.0003785702,0.001067853,0.002640512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004426747,0.0003260398,0.0003593082,0.0007437713,0.0006347785,0.0006904296,0.0003545597,0.001087818,0.000985418],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005772215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000627551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005868386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005877223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990606,0.0001959215,0.0001291271,0.0001197189,0.0004014079,0.00009335982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969053,0.0008958218,0.0002103608,0.0001284682,0.001237905,0.0006221614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009967768,0.003473455,0.3061963,0.001028064,0.0002297646,0.2198575,0.003034841,0.001203303,0.1873357,0.000426543,0.008230215,0.2590165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003893899,0.02764603,0.6019076,0.0001264777,0.0001583127,0.3335146,0.0008305558,0.002235314,0.01960708,0.0001601843,0.01325956,0.000164949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688002,0.005759271,0.005373017,0.0007949924,0.0001768793,0.0009855456,0.0008127514,0.0002387221,0.01705862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888755,0.002052646,0.002847105,0.0007716289,0.00009084379,0.0001121398,0.0003997062,0.000047959,0.004802427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005868386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01166844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04500954744411532,"score_gpt":0.3759132124949662,"score_spread":0.3309036650508508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}