{"id":"W3209476552","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2021-0178","title":"Economics of forest bioeconomy: new results","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strategic Research Council; Academy of Finland","keywords":"Bioproducts; Pulp (tooth); STREAMS; Revenue; Pulp and paper industry; Forest product; Business; Ecosystem; Mill; Profitability index; Forest industry; Forest management; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Economics; Forestry; Ecology; Engineering; Waste management; Biofuel; Computer science; Biology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001498162,0.00009194512,0.0002453968,0.0000977261,0.0002119443,0.0001140095,0.0004512491,0.0001196481,0.0005149855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005825559,0.00004519879,0.0001347604,0.0003342855,0.0002290582,0.0001709222,0.0000492379,0.0003311519,0.00001899821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003254832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00378756,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01722278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7147867,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984782,0.0001202945,0.0005763413,0.0001906397,0.0001271772,0.0005073095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977412,0.0003319611,0.0001556493,0.0001001829,0.0007634738,0.0009075382],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001791383,0.00007491805,0.7518635,0.00003843682,0.0001000907,0.0003473855,0.0007054839,0.0002292941,0.0003514865,0.01662065,0.02187776,0.2076118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002903514,0.0002937111,0.5487847,0.00003222906,0.000003361045,0.00006787843,0.001333388,0.000006727098,0.001212389,0.01180376,0.4360688,0.0001027173],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797991,0.0004930867,0.000002030927,0.01576446,0.00015542,0.0001026884,0.00004759265,0.000001731583,0.00363389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973387,0.0001098863,0.0002444732,0.000119616,0.0002918449,0.000001391067,0.000021447,0.000001111194,0.00187156],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6975639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05897044220609661,"score_gpt":0.2747222531380776,"score_spread":0.215751810931981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}