{"id":"W3209889693","doi":"10.2166/wcc.2021.254","title":"Environmental flow assessment in the context of climate change: a case study in Southern Quebec (Canada)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water and Climate Change","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; Université de Moncton; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Metric (unit); Environmental science; Flow (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Climate change; Proxy (statistics); Environmental flow; Flow conditions; Hydrology (agriculture); Climatology; Geography; Physical geography; Statistics; Mathematics; Geology; Operations management; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005250118,0.0003142009,0.0002214299,0.0008905364,0.002637927,0.001582255,0.0009478276,0.0007246818,0.001968649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001210176,0.0001386061,0.0003042261,0.002935937,0.0007761103,0.0003206041,0.0004469118,0.0005154395,0.0001249311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04078801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0202424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976177,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996504,0.00006950634,0.000009916188,0.00003730073,0.0001012233,0.0001318074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992228,0.0001583055,0.00005270391,0.00002434292,0.0003944565,0.0001474475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004479706,0.0009947006,0.6799634,0.0003644543,0.0002355359,0.01301615,0.005467839,0.1832244,0.004332043,0.006000146,0.01784494,0.08810844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001470156,0.0002857172,0.7789985,0.0001715763,0.0001242016,0.0006610318,0.02622075,0.1654296,0.001876455,0.001047945,0.02488698,0.0001502541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882672,0.0002086715,0.0008325381,0.0007966929,0.00001043072,0.0001367463,0.001787897,0.00006141746,0.007898309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927688,0.000195154,0.001736135,0.0001332972,0.000004518178,0.00004136502,0.0007059125,0.00001073987,0.004404056],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04078801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2959391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02604475140288684,"score_gpt":0.2513516843707568,"score_spread":0.2253069329678699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}