{"id":"W3209889693","doi":"10.2166/wcc.2021.254","title":"Environmental flow assessment in the context of climate change: a case study in Southern Quebec (Canada)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water and Climate Change","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques, de la Faune et des Parcs; Université de Moncton; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Metric (unit); Environmental science; Flow (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Climate change; Proxy (statistics); Environmental flow; Flow conditions; Hydrology (agriculture); Climatology; Geography; Physical geography; Statistics; Mathematics; Geology; Operations management; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007506471,0.0001268578,0.0002672639,0.00004737524,0.00009507674,0.00001658736,0.0001159631,0.00003211634,0.0002221286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002319734,0.00007364075,0.00003949866,0.00006331995,0.00008682267,0.0001755039,0.0002815409,0.0001839199,0.000004292651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001132644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005077092,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06741411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.793645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987141,0.0002093162,0.0003660593,0.0001492752,0.0002643496,0.0002968858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996994,0.00003019324,0.0001136358,0.0001158374,0.000003998587,0.00003700213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005416627,0.0004935149,0.8965642,0.00003134884,0.00003194415,0.008506877,0.0880872,0.00001500515,0.0002360199,0.000002889185,0.00003060863,0.005946154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002212986,0.0003370099,0.6108872,0.00005526734,0.00009190152,0.0006791554,0.3847114,0.0002012417,0.0001583586,0.00003185846,0.0004473914,0.0001861711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971282,0.000156892,6.156449e-7,0.002109646,0.00009008501,0.0002582565,0.00002111257,0.000001260545,0.000233884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983329,0.000785939,0.00001498643,0.0007725148,0.00004032922,0.00002875044,0.000003175311,0.000006714112,0.00001465503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7262309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.938796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02604475140288684,"score_gpt":0.2513516843707568,"score_spread":0.2253069329678699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}