{"id":"W3210255241","doi":"10.1002/nafm.10719","title":"Methods for Estimating Abundance and Associated Uncertainty from Passive Count Technologies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North American Journal of Fisheries Management","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; EcoMetrix; Simon Fraser University; InStream Fisheries Research (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); False positive paradox; Statistics; Oncorhynchus; Computer science; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Abundance estimation; Count data; Ecology; Mathematics; Fishery; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01289198,0.001480046,0.00107438,0.003305447,0.0006781759,0.002027685,0.003182704,0.001167412,0.001535892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05936077,0.001030125,0.001650594,0.001952697,0.00154993,0.002743913,0.002730131,0.002148156,0.0004386521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001554554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00186011,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008693404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004794523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9937811,0.002045203,0.0004756235,0.001313398,0.002217317,0.0001672394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9622336,0.02685832,0.004390206,0.002502214,0.003826936,0.0001887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008718127,0.00008474497,0.0192234,0.000417856,0.0003563204,0.0001409951,0.0003475138,0.7670893,0.003547639,0.03798138,0.001522091,0.1692016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001152312,0.0000443272,0.003213996,0.000100432,0.00003392328,0.00009430217,0.00003495505,0.9655195,0.002071735,0.02637718,0.002444551,0.00005354505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004972903,0.0001300586,0.9941186,0.00004717077,0.00001638098,0.00004848436,0.00009746355,0.000231862,0.0003371844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2677366,0.0004433243,0.7279763,0.0001622047,0.0001442302,0.0007611749,0.0009084667,0.0002190978,0.001648671],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01289198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06818008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009917400293124264,"score_gpt":0.2595643524464319,"score_spread":0.2496469521533076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}