{"id":"W3210293845","doi":"10.1111/ijsa.12354","title":"Examining the situational antecedents of interview faking behavior: A qualitative study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Selection and Assessment","topic":"Employer Branding and e-HRM","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Situational ethics; Psychology; Thematic analysis; Focus group; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Interview; Scope (computer science); Qualitative research; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001055972,0.00008049601,0.000148139,0.0001875534,0.00009728371,0.0002165348,0.0001540118,0.00001869625,0.0001533296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007996631,0.00005926626,0.00006041827,0.000187263,0.00002226786,0.0004959514,0.00009033302,0.0001558585,0.000001324012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005457332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005783513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005519578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008499469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987729,0.00007402711,0.0004325056,0.0001015319,0.0005472744,0.00007174473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983372,0.00009690556,0.0005319246,0.00004198537,0.0009833663,0.00000862746],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002183978,0.003740163,0.8131911,0.0001291312,0.002129985,0.0001797805,0.01991504,0.000331715,0.01754554,0.01673863,0.002033887,0.1238466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003777947,0.0003015678,0.8371844,0.0006731718,0.0004354576,0.0003141863,0.1427832,0.001755001,0.0006270026,0.002949348,0.008892744,0.0003059219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939115,0.00008455425,0.003079085,0.0009215286,0.0007407103,0.00007483296,0.000001341851,0.000007505392,0.001178913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998816,0.00003155225,0.0003285107,0.000278724,0.0004563677,0.000005851741,0.000004674255,0.000006847863,0.00007148348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1235407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2416808,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1134120395330205,"score_gpt":0.4096706805206525,"score_spread":0.296258640987632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}