{"id":"W3210410995","doi":"10.22214/ijraset.2021.38570","title":"Failure Rate Prediction of Belt Conveyor Systems using 2-parameter Weibull distribution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology","topic":"Belt Conveyor Systems Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Weibull distribution; Conveyor belt; Failure rate; Reliability engineering; Shape parameter; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Belt conveyor; Component (thermodynamics); Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001527315,0.0009065938,0.0004525738,0.002003351,0.0002534324,0.0006356793,0.000731927,0.00103388,0.00156569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004212484,0.0002441997,0.0006922702,0.001259061,0.0002669254,0.0006753699,0.000308716,0.0005180785,0.000482858],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009762764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000311781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008137623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002607449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994912,0.0001280406,0.00003113601,0.00009389152,0.0001879978,0.00006769231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971545,0.001811714,0.0003847514,0.0001863843,0.0004136808,0.00004899441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001567458,0.00005265926,0.02413805,0.00005630134,0.00003263491,0.0001324645,0.00007770675,0.953417,0.003215485,0.0005868638,0.0003824353,0.01775164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002672363,0.00005570084,0.008507648,0.000008567265,0.00000667232,0.00004781418,0.00002525664,0.9897104,0.001197094,0.0002993101,0.0001272932,0.00001159498],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8241867,0.0005313861,0.1715417,0.0001348894,0.00002013686,0.00006700928,0.000757289,0.0007775277,0.001983428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963456,0.00006836682,0.002880344,0.000004458931,0.000003626351,0.00001389808,0.0001832769,0.00001186228,0.0004885017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008137623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01618052,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05057345179160172,"score_gpt":0.3269096203102823,"score_spread":0.2763361685186805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}