{"id":"W3210599015","doi":"10.15353/cjo.v49i1.4539","title":"Evaluation of Soft Contact Lens Performance Using the Contrast Sensitivity Function","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry","topic":"Ocular Surface and Contact Lens","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contact lens; Lens (geology); Optometry; Contrast (vision); Visual acuity; Sensitivity (control systems); Optics; Tact; Refractive error; Medicine; Ophthalmology; Computer science; Computer vision; Psychology; Physics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001268219,0.0008335229,0.0006669079,0.003580149,0.0003698217,0.0007573607,0.0003574856,0.0005460513,0.00376692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002591858,0.0001760223,0.0006927632,0.001419215,0.0004773319,0.0006362419,0.0005912836,0.0005957437,0.0006671984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004873319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000473224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005005931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00358245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990271,0.0001539014,0.0001266347,0.00008801931,0.0004946157,0.0001097188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979312,0.0004003769,0.0003900182,0.00008281537,0.0009513788,0.0002442345],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005946579,0.0009546829,0.7062203,0.001176778,0.00079692,0.002840463,0.00106894,0.001427925,0.153984,0.0007866507,0.002808724,0.121988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005524939,0.004730091,0.9178131,0.0001542509,0.0002829987,0.004985082,0.0005303893,0.003741635,0.06373845,0.0002859847,0.003581394,0.0001013401],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725532,0.005783983,0.006837638,0.0001151005,0.00005401867,0.0003029596,0.001535453,0.0002064089,0.01261124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913188,0.001374863,0.002918244,0.00007777061,0.00002411377,0.00008084551,0.0006459421,0.00003205319,0.00352733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005005931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01260161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0342129953760952,"score_gpt":0.3148469010037472,"score_spread":0.2806339056276521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}