{"id":"W3210728649","doi":"10.1049/cps2.12019","title":"A comparative analysis of CGAN‐based oversampling for anomaly detection","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IET Cyber-Physical Systems Theory & Applications","topic":"Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Oversampling; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Anomaly detection; Random forest; Naive Bayes classifier; Machine learning; Context (archaeology); Pattern recognition (psychology); Anomaly (physics); Geology; Bandwidth (computing); Physics; Support vector machine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006714385,0.0006857641,0.0008660422,0.0008941091,0.0004730713,0.0007572871,0.0009934059,0.0007345435,0.0005839078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01462463,0.0001966134,0.0004608556,0.0005631628,0.0008227163,0.001553485,0.001185681,0.0008650211,0.0001225447],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009331529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006884302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002894823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002112305,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99703,0.001300204,0.0001169046,0.0004131401,0.0009092643,0.0002303597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907856,0.00595064,0.0004791676,0.00106011,0.001481498,0.0002430611],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002091228,0.0004573811,0.01601922,0.0001688863,0.0002776428,0.0001747084,0.0001802654,0.5977246,0.01334366,0.009102006,0.001824399,0.358636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007374181,0.0001687741,0.000952522,0.000005468593,0.00002053681,0.00005417776,0.00001975519,0.99293,0.004396923,0.001090736,0.0003481453,0.000005675866],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4421815,0.002248847,0.5500765,0.0005236447,0.0002169735,0.0001298871,0.00008237882,0.00158925,0.002951076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545407,0.0002130155,0.04453134,0.00008229298,0.00003695972,0.00001989755,0.0001300004,0.0000330647,0.0004125527],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006714385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03550953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02148787329649886,"score_gpt":0.3016077231402255,"score_spread":0.2801198498437266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}