{"id":"W3210946536","doi":"10.1080/01924036.2021.1989607","title":"Risk assessment of recidivism in Latin America: assessing the reliability and validity of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice","topic":"Crime Patterns and Interventions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Reliability (semiconductor); Psychology; Latin Americans; Risk assessment; Validity; Test validity; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Power (physics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001061901,0.00006937126,0.0002019798,0.00004315651,0.0001619308,0.00007115305,0.000220556,0.00002906083,0.00003553627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003325229,0.00004543741,0.00007994333,0.0001259733,0.0003462335,0.0001575123,0.00009246357,0.0002737741,1.662508e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005661342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002165105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002849961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002048213,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983704,0.0005356844,0.0004609449,0.0001006625,0.0004549292,0.00007739391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977401,0.0008354775,0.0006468874,0.00007752243,0.0006656145,0.00003436323],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002283219,0.002664436,0.6369959,0.0004047902,0.0006193425,0.00002529235,0.1382024,0.003858079,0.009425053,0.1820479,0.001351945,0.02417657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003922592,0.00006007979,0.9390457,0.000240512,0.0003500231,0.00001165694,0.05406237,0.0008173465,0.001744817,0.002334512,0.0008756223,0.00006516105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902394,0.0001240084,0.004346554,0.001169786,0.0003785616,0.0000672515,0.00001036373,0.0000020619,0.003662037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978466,0.0002008439,0.001757374,0.00004737662,0.0001282098,0.000002347103,6.987804e-7,0.00000220842,0.00001434973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3020497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1852884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0813078458867614,"score_gpt":0.4514226462972398,"score_spread":0.3701148004104784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}