{"id":"W3211090130","doi":"10.34119/bjhrv4n5-382","title":"Methodological quality assessment in systematic reviews in health sciences that included observational studies: a cross-sectional study/ Avaliação da qualidade metodológica em revisões sistemáticas na área das ciências da saúde que incluíram estudos observacionais: um estudo transversal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Journal of Health Review","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Protocol (science); Medicine; Guideline; Cross-sectional study; Logistic regression; Quality assessment; Sample size determination; Data extraction; Odds ratio; Systematic review; Family medicine; MEDLINE; External quality assessment; Internal medicine; Alternative medicine; Statistics; Pathology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7208849,0.001179131,0.02591721,0.001116931,0.001136529,0.00146644,0.004045326,0.0002369312,0.001133573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2592912,0.0006357557,0.00424762,0.007848373,0.0003880383,0.001305628,0.0006134738,0.001738173,0.0001548107],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001862792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005846977,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001323729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008317307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4771629,0.4103238,0.08681836,0.003653723,0.02023957,0.00180161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8023639,0.09540458,0.08465254,0.007208694,0.008467884,0.001902442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006808078,0.002451391,0.7784526,0.1943162,0.001053391,0.0002026631,0.006406967,0.0003145377,0.00001620063,0.00491362,0.004615611,0.007188746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001849992,0.001116417,0.8749142,0.09093621,0.0004407685,0.0005212493,0.01501748,0.0001859526,0.00000154585,0.00247154,0.01175972,0.0007849464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1544185,0.8009582,0.004800721,0.0254237,0.001303509,0.01291488,0.00005695372,0.00001700744,0.0001065333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6421889,0.2500351,0.08399542,0.02133698,0.0003665067,0.001384161,0.00006092668,0.00009101052,0.0005409702],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5509231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997889,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9343442770197693,"score_gpt":0.6785030062861045,"score_spread":0.2558412707336648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}