{"id":"W3211090130","doi":"10.34119/bjhrv4n5-382","title":"Methodological quality assessment in systematic reviews in health sciences that included observational studies: a cross-sectional study/ Avaliação da qualidade metodológica em revisões sistemáticas na área das ciências da saúde que incluíram estudos observacionais: um estudo transversal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Journal of Health Review","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Protocol (science); Medicine; Guideline; Cross-sectional study; Logistic regression; Quality assessment; Sample size determination; Data extraction; Odds ratio; Systematic review; Family medicine; MEDLINE; External quality assessment; Internal medicine; Alternative medicine; Statistics; Pathology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4831578,0.002267781,0.01146169,0.02680998,0.003648886,0.00947022,0.004053364,0.004712175,0.003074456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7229513,0.003308892,0.01587362,0.0304372,0.005815503,0.009782665,0.008183652,0.002925495,0.0005558475],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01297855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03764986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007060221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01387239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3152962,0.2773233,0.3351037,0.01926155,0.05031402,0.00270116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1683644,0.5599887,0.1684109,0.03917414,0.06195569,0.002106222],"domain_codex":"reporting","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001772302,0.0001225779,0.08098,0.7965929,0.03791634,0.0004488665,0.0132812,0.0006844786,0.001325716,0.005196191,0.005691537,0.05598797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003681415,0.001476761,0.119322,0.693009,0.106542,0.001972368,0.007378611,0.002723491,0.003301927,0.01596305,0.04400488,0.0006244543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08450992,0.7469999,0.06760953,0.01463092,0.003547437,0.06463315,0.01292966,0.0004371131,0.00470232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5307736,0.130739,0.1454555,0.008107946,0.001318463,0.1746427,0.007716517,0.000300167,0.0009461406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5168422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6373585,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9343442770197693,"score_gpt":0.6785030062861045,"score_spread":0.2558412707336648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}