{"id":"W3212221828","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100121","title":"Global environmental agreement-making: Upping the methodological and ethical stakes of studying negotiations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earth System Governance","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"European Research Council; Horizon 2020; Economic and Social Research Council; European Commission","keywords":"Negotiation; Scholarship; Politics; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Management science; Social science; Economics; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1005127,0.001208245,0.002038292,0.004479292,0.009241212,0.02676569,0.004829972,0.008683753,0.005483251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06817994,0.0007234177,0.00139404,0.005480457,0.1087307,0.0445093,0.02244726,0.01255109,0.00089557],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008729727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01172863,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002092531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002874392,"domain_scores_codex":[0.916764,0.07020403,0.001512862,0.003966926,0.005267068,0.002285103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8899068,0.08807768,0.003854316,0.01298405,0.003225249,0.001951956],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007560285,0.000008310099,0.0001750561,0.00009066664,0.000008239163,0.00005769254,0.01686593,0.0002851624,0.00007576262,0.9772702,0.0005147497,0.004640715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005133859,0.000009070424,0.0001401278,0.0002781049,0.000006708399,0.00005512511,0.01150036,0.0004299311,0.0001568086,0.9539658,0.03343883,0.00001382277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05077512,0.02675468,0.4665082,0.1689048,0.002870964,0.0003175048,0.0001572273,0.0002127853,0.2834988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8995289,0.008572868,0.0761224,0.006963855,0.001094584,0.0005920058,0.0001082335,0.0002601979,0.006756946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1005127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5315685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06694359629960842,"score_gpt":0.2953484123913468,"score_spread":0.2284048160917384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}