{"id":"W3212221828","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100121","title":"Global environmental agreement-making: Upping the methodological and ethical stakes of studying negotiations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earth System Governance","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"European Research Council; Horizon 2020; Economic and Social Research Council; European Commission","keywords":"Negotiation; Scholarship; Politics; Dominance (genetics); Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Management science; Social science; Economics; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008612423,0.0001494831,0.0002569421,0.000003146112,0.0002605386,0.00003864071,0.0002193041,0.0001172776,0.0005059235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004525302,0.0001140285,0.00007752693,0.0002169751,0.0003491253,0.00008463488,0.0003958548,0.0002029237,0.00002781254],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002888245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002143305,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001237875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004944911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978678,0.0004919929,0.0003505653,0.0004077448,0.0005927336,0.0002891344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988998,0.0003631608,0.0003122375,0.0003585518,0.00001081558,0.00005538889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009456341,0.0002419861,0.9292083,0.0004063876,0.000104121,0.0001461681,0.01141617,0.003362544,0.005641535,0.0333776,0.0006183026,0.01538228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003431645,0.00005816411,0.9667838,0.0001213118,0.00003089258,0.00007588236,0.02365739,0.0008759939,0.0006411313,0.000237655,0.00698932,0.0001852834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991106,0.001209627,0.001318539,0.00133787,0.0001625752,0.0002579892,0.000107924,0.00002315962,0.004476319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979773,0.0001183138,0.001297481,0.0003196546,0.00004481203,0.00001906433,0.000002341551,0.000005966786,0.0002151334],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03757547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5539508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06694359629960842,"score_gpt":0.2953484123913468,"score_spread":0.2284048160917384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}