{"id":"W3212666588","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ac386f","title":"Substitution impacts of wood use at the market level: a systematic review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Research Letters","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Directorate-General for Energy; Academy of Finland; Government of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Product (mathematics); Substitution (logic); Environmental science; Forest product; Range (aeronautics); Market share; Climate change; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics; Forest management; Economics; Engineering; Ecology; Agroforestry; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01058788,0.001164347,0.00420945,0.007697526,0.0004035945,0.002277244,0.001637017,0.001372843,0.004616233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04750344,0.0007472745,0.007256266,0.008702466,0.0009010831,0.002353564,0.001205129,0.001012452,0.0003134398],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002418505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008581338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006230591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0178916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904844,0.003886153,0.002527848,0.0008703905,0.001975778,0.0002555446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958539,0.0315758,0.0058433,0.0006586725,0.003122709,0.0002605447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001951931,0.00001996188,0.002435235,0.9318873,0.01352064,0.0001476523,0.0002079741,0.000300069,0.0002608161,0.0007083692,0.001489575,0.0488273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001603731,0.0002755125,0.01085448,0.8686749,0.07891218,0.000520861,0.0005083493,0.0002893341,0.0005240693,0.001133211,0.03809327,0.00005345761],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003251307,0.9941812,0.0004936624,0.0003442692,0.000117415,0.0002320813,0.0007816175,0.000009991763,0.0005884312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05419424,0.9429467,0.001136067,0.0005705561,0.00007234566,0.000418356,0.0004568063,0.00001148329,0.0001935181],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01058788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05599469,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09740710194970462,"score_gpt":0.3720953785739801,"score_spread":0.2746882766242754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}