{"id":"W3212759353","doi":"10.1080/24751979.2021.1972767","title":"Methodological Quality and Validity Issues in the Crime Prevention Literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Justice Evaluation Journal","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Public Safety Canada","keywords":"Fidelity; Psychological intervention; Crime prevention; External validity; Strengths and weaknesses; Quality (philosophy); Internal validity; Psychology; Inclusion (mineral); Management science; Applied psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology; Criminology; Engineering; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1135113,0.0001055214,0.0002342994,0.0001491506,0.0003552241,0.001104598,0.0002961688,0.00009540061,0.003215226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04093667,0.00005921257,0.00009670233,0.0008214415,0.00004622234,0.0007581837,0.00005605791,0.0005082538,0.00005063383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006641509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004642075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001562025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001928129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9759822,0.01881671,0.0009851099,0.0003201649,0.003717788,0.0001780156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924917,0.004551463,0.0004433799,0.000331593,0.002104374,0.00007744278],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002970274,0.0007504132,0.04911034,0.0001080461,0.00006728223,0.0000946954,0.04181267,0.005267419,0.003514892,0.0352269,0.03964393,0.8241064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009162222,0.0001176024,0.75574,0.00005898492,0.0001487179,0.0003028546,0.01354789,0.01757119,0.0001737483,0.2002136,0.0110879,0.0001212453],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048007,0.004031057,0.0283044,0.05375564,0.001539345,0.0004081983,0.000006004994,0.00001308003,0.007141533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786539,0.0008347221,0.01584408,0.002542975,0.00094567,0.00002286967,0.0000190604,0.000004867246,0.001131847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8239852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8674694788525665,"score_gpt":0.6999287630133438,"score_spread":0.1675407158392227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}