{"id":"W3212841372","doi":"10.1063/5.0102388","title":"A survey of two analytical wake models for crosswind kite power systems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics of Fluids","topic":"Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Crosswind; Wake; Kite; Aerodynamics; Computational fluid dynamics; Physics; Aerospace engineering; Flow (mathematics); Wind power; Mechanics; Marine engineering; Meteorology; Applied mathematics; Classical mechanics; Mathematics; Engineering; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004095915,0.0009225269,0.0007409249,0.0009914591,0.0005712149,0.0009843933,0.001310065,0.0006836235,0.003436123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001003294,0.000525679,0.0008128076,0.001024029,0.0005260582,0.002132672,0.0008011853,0.0008853813,0.0010649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005680957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007155481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002786185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002307742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997554,0.00006731752,0.00001949745,0.00003206858,0.00009310216,0.0000325336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996814,0.0001558293,0.00003675321,0.00003518399,0.000078252,0.00001259867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004523316,0.00009803243,0.001801179,0.0006406463,0.00005222585,0.0002092555,0.0003597098,0.6418661,0.002409683,0.1712855,0.00825686,0.1729756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007106001,0.00005624616,0.0004171563,0.0001012148,0.00001330164,0.0001440007,0.00009051092,0.9348689,0.0007454586,0.03441071,0.02911534,0.00003007572],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01895148,0.01392789,0.9301414,0.0005917327,0.0002585461,0.00006126671,0.0002068264,0.0005588675,0.03530197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6965299,0.0451413,0.2151749,0.000468778,0.0007610302,0.0003260293,0.000853895,0.0006457918,0.04009828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003436123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01149493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02906427803957187,"score_gpt":0.2475780343622491,"score_spread":0.2185137563226772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}