{"id":"W3212951677","doi":"10.3389/fcomm.2021.770497","title":"Power and Positivity: Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Word Valence in Canadian Parliament","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Communication","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Parliament; Opposition (politics); Valence (chemistry); Politics; Political science; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001279436,0.000344527,0.0003320425,0.002182711,0.002884458,0.003026649,0.0004451649,0.0003513731,0.002733896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007376289,0.0002221373,0.0003620086,0.002097769,0.003135368,0.0008435437,0.001497973,0.0007511195,0.0001700586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008011535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004345772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7288256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8228393,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989362,0.0002041052,0.0000318146,0.0001419977,0.0004324515,0.0002533485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973315,0.001018065,0.0005175347,0.000116221,0.0007811449,0.0002355851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00133418,0.0001256212,0.665674,0.0004103968,0.0001564754,0.0006793869,0.1904465,0.0007702017,0.05598278,0.00952247,0.002888897,0.07200905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004440595,0.00001856018,0.9826452,0.00002448372,0.00001963885,0.00005021468,0.01363581,0.0002577319,0.0006427133,0.0006899576,0.001978964,0.00003233374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823434,0.0002302666,0.0004537871,0.0002039234,0.00001413571,0.00002078503,0.0002145385,0.00000926168,0.01650987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987506,0.00009772113,0.0002296516,0.00005071998,0.000006581388,0.00001273997,0.0001221889,0.000009968201,0.0007199292],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2711744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5455427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01473890947487872,"score_gpt":0.2993198337152442,"score_spread":0.2845809242403655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}