{"id":"W3213408760","doi":"10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.200","title":"Managing demand volatility during unplanned events with sentiment analysis: a case study of the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFAC-PapersOnLine","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Volatility (finance); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sentiment analysis; Consumption (sociology); Predictive power; Pandemic; Analytics; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Social media; Econometrics; Business; Economics; Data science; Computer science; Outbreak; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007665097,0.0002490951,0.0006783384,0.0002777301,0.0002724194,0.00003720728,0.0002595436,0.00008159957,0.0002885159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003332382,0.0002116457,0.000213402,0.001336325,0.00005155648,0.0001442726,0.0002107691,0.0002435337,0.00001194379],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004477718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001372885,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002685645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007998358,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979455,0.00011696,0.0007504097,0.0006717051,0.000139457,0.0003758972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981879,0.0001661225,0.0005377496,0.0008500437,0.00005333885,0.0002048705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008412829,0.0004583698,0.9830476,0.0001082122,0.001272945,0.0005501382,0.005517445,0.008780443,0.00009666268,0.00001658977,0.000001629206,0.00006582414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01387242,0.0004383723,0.9034806,0.00008673113,0.001886183,0.001881162,0.02102813,0.05460468,0.0002347183,0.000790704,0.0005225522,0.001173677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963565,0.0004790334,0.001251846,0.0009644114,0.0001058923,0.0004765317,0.0002199109,0.00004088297,0.0001050102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975721,0.00003258793,0.0008338511,0.000759328,0.00004110477,0.00001911833,0.00001955682,0.00002281048,0.0006994993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07956695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8630662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05471852475556858,"score_gpt":0.2939417582452745,"score_spread":0.2392232334897059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}