{"id":"W3213536632","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000001571","title":"Responsiveness of a Histologic Scoring System Compared With Peak Eosinophil Count in Eosinophilic Esophagitis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Gastroenterology","topic":"Eosinophilic Esophagitis","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver General Hospital; Western University; Robarts Clinical Trials; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Eosinophilic esophagitis; Gastroenterology; Eosinophil; Confidence interval; Internal medicine; Visual analogue scale; Receiver operating characteristic; Area under the curve; Stage (stratigraphy); Eosinophilia; Surgery; Asthma; Disease","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0269601,0.0007515301,0.001020077,0.001875284,0.0002063483,0.0008198443,0.0005750034,0.0006392764,0.001094827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04403991,0.0001857436,0.001057133,0.0009464289,0.0005882694,0.0007534731,0.000783739,0.0006527886,0.0004168766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003870455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002989025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003483438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003399228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.983523,0.01118974,0.001147556,0.001150609,0.002728335,0.0002608218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950415,0.02823353,0.01267443,0.002781548,0.004971876,0.0009236473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003923522,0.0001503298,0.9529084,0.0002809597,0.001480158,0.00005440226,0.0001348736,0.001867656,0.002410024,0.00007373215,0.0005523079,0.03616375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002037611,0.005247356,0.9777565,0.0001313389,0.0007066664,0.0004901658,0.0001528884,0.01129581,0.002485892,0.0004167384,0.001059495,0.00005327825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832389,0.005468223,0.00715577,0.0003046444,0.0001679851,0.0002556303,0.0006647412,0.0001424556,0.002601597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970528,0.0002697619,0.001985527,0.00008362965,0.00007540394,0.00007318919,0.000300934,0.0000128812,0.0001459584],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0269601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1425803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01239871158894338,"score_gpt":0.2489941870965604,"score_spread":0.236595475507617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}