{"id":"W3214841906","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101732","title":"The limited impact of positive cueing on pro-environmental choices","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Spillover effect; Cued speech; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Social marketing; Marketing; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Business; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003072592,0.0002247483,0.0003471237,0.0002423065,0.0003944398,0.0005497094,0.000302434,0.0004152077,0.005883745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02073245,0.0001666165,0.0002974104,0.0002070389,0.000784229,0.0004971088,0.00104898,0.0007201206,0.0002452703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002331641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000567821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001855669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00384781,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977334,0.001308521,0.00009646486,0.000278877,0.0004421016,0.0001406988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680995,0.02640539,0.001811949,0.002013387,0.00065175,0.001018093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01932293,0.01029864,0.3831063,0.002909491,0.001000161,0.000745311,0.008347983,0.003930947,0.1128608,0.006152773,0.002238402,0.4490864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003540649,0.008190563,0.9571946,0.0002517841,0.0006710325,0.0002993497,0.00222245,0.002002659,0.01615837,0.005031664,0.007542,0.00008146365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920163,0.0002416709,0.0004535749,0.0001779772,0.00001644438,0.00002797686,0.00005536349,0.000008902341,0.007001834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989949,0.0001260031,0.0004424505,0.00008244226,0.000009200006,0.00002366524,0.00002751764,0.000004833124,0.0002890314],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005883745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01968312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01083730903100054,"score_gpt":0.3194359826680755,"score_spread":0.3085986736370749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}