{"id":"W3214858155","doi":"10.1109/mwsym.2002.1011791","title":"Feasible adjoint sensitivity technique for EM design optimization","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjoint equation; Sensitivity (control systems); Overhead (engineering); Method of moments (probability theory); Focus (optics); Antenna (radio); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Optimal design; Mathematics; Electronic engineering; Mathematical analysis; Engineering; Telecommunications; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001335227,0.0009770301,0.0006940964,0.0009180006,0.0003618305,0.0007631334,0.0005755361,0.0007205345,0.003106776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002463787,0.0005714007,0.0009443464,0.0004876844,0.0006936963,0.0005852911,0.0009743529,0.001168607,0.0007450244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003385271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006110994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004692242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003637223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992798,0.0003435084,0.00001807912,0.00004385877,0.0002851264,0.00002962198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993902,0.0003906186,0.00004516691,0.00006672399,0.00009250404,0.00001479463],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007369944,0.00006596252,0.000306167,0.0001686268,0.00005982067,0.0001476998,0.0001188336,0.7424214,0.02573937,0.1380151,0.001912605,0.09097067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007559574,0.00003722859,0.00005284219,0.00001192943,0.000006683177,0.0000433432,0.000005788249,0.9798845,0.002825814,0.01450962,0.00260342,0.00001115371],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001283547,0.00003508875,0.9974195,0.00002572081,0.00001179693,0.00001395645,0.000008278424,0.0001175648,0.001084524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2379608,0.0002666606,0.7565853,0.0001258363,0.00005287122,0.0004745562,0.0001194103,0.0002364007,0.004178064],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003106776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0103932,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03060099809455259,"score_gpt":0.2728545427974373,"score_spread":0.2422535447028847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}