{"id":"W3215500762","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2111.13735","title":"Resilient Nash Equilibrium Seeking in the Partial Information Setting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Misinformation; Best response; Graph; Adversarial system; Mathematical economics; Core (optical fiber); Correlated equilibrium; Action (physics); Computer security; Game theory; Mathematical optimization; Theoretical computer science; Equilibrium selection; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002680288,0.001040585,0.001270385,0.000773152,0.0008102306,0.001169796,0.00145316,0.001562392,0.001255998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01183704,0.000482691,0.0007197031,0.0006369936,0.002252035,0.00222554,0.002158885,0.00179101,0.0001915655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001653099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001369833,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002730333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002040032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979797,0.0009265696,0.00008354645,0.0004628128,0.0003277586,0.0002196381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904456,0.007361503,0.0008970105,0.0005803433,0.0004010646,0.0003144131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002144069,0.00006614575,0.0008311326,0.0001033804,0.0001015973,0.0001949581,0.0002408392,0.8744667,0.002658676,0.1022626,0.001041504,0.01781809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002402613,0.00005086784,0.0001279343,0.000009405737,0.00001263201,0.00004314492,0.00002669961,0.9080247,0.0008393154,0.09046519,0.0003625332,0.00001358081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06249692,0.0001407497,0.9321464,0.0006527951,0.00003091283,0.0001039012,0.0000830555,0.000257064,0.004088256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9005009,0.0001350182,0.09674899,0.0001823602,0.00002593113,0.0001200491,0.00007838323,0.00003757119,0.002170754],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002730333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01417488,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1443530811351068,"score_gpt":0.2664230518273936,"score_spread":0.1220699706922868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}