{"id":"W3215635654","doi":"10.3390/su132313275","title":"A Comparative Analysis of Consumption: Evidence from a Cultural Goods Market","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Qualitative comparative analysis; Credibility; Quality (philosophy); Consumption (sociology); Industrial organization; Product (mathematics); Reliability (semiconductor); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Marketing; Information asymmetry; Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002891801,0.000136238,0.0007522803,0.0001941492,0.0003718294,0.0001038846,0.000354774,0.00007677825,0.01390902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01117721,0.0001257032,0.0004140795,0.003795489,0.001804418,0.0004671884,0.0001630293,0.0001975654,0.00002298101],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001103027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001643811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009089863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0230748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911587,0.00659566,0.0004606129,0.000528297,0.0008880422,0.0003687415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886591,0.004494268,0.0001926618,0.0005094429,0.005970891,0.000173649],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001593396,0.0002723227,0.8183879,0.00006036249,0.002339895,0.00001607836,0.158393,0.0001637273,0.0004673996,0.01584771,0.003490845,0.0004014005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001467127,0.00002894601,0.8781769,0.00002198124,0.0006163329,5.541508e-8,0.1042177,0.001495388,0.0009360042,0.009197369,0.00499485,0.0001677347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861813,0.001568186,0.001900947,0.002368016,0.00003124332,0.0003008416,0.00006698108,0.00002745881,0.007554995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953327,0.0001340677,0.0005199986,0.00003029511,0.00003562423,0.00003649693,0.00003311801,0.000002352096,0.003875406],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05978901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.198100722174843,"score_gpt":0.5334353706617804,"score_spread":0.3353346484869373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}