{"id":"W3216048111","doi":"10.1007/s11145-021-10228-4","title":"Reading in different scripts predicts different cognitive skills: evidence from Japanese","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading and Writing","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Kanji; Psychology; Fluency; Vocabulary; Reading (process); Phonological awareness; Syllabic verse; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Cognitive skill; Scripting language; Literacy; Linguistics; Computer science; Communication; Speech recognition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003964442,0.0003438063,0.0005362984,0.0001875727,0.000199519,0.0002109075,0.0001308917,0.0001657582,0.0002122739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006203659,0.0003016286,0.00007801404,0.000244835,0.00006625974,0.0002009988,0.0001481941,0.0004473052,0.00004376256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001280627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002834376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004611603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002908385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997256,0.0003627719,0.0006131364,0.0008555976,0.0002817751,0.0006307486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973195,0.001951132,0.000148394,0.0002727752,0.00009540466,0.0002128394],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000783966,0.0003218226,0.8748999,0.0001119944,0.0001621764,0.0007538276,0.06105144,0.000001982488,0.004947311,0.0003387137,0.0003686095,0.05696382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001284362,0.00006532361,0.9672728,0.01048122,0.00007214263,0.0001295292,0.0162238,0.0003415174,0.003192601,0.0002871828,0.0001491735,0.0005003579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909844,0.002318302,0.0001548582,0.0002328564,0.0006382935,0.0001784107,0.00002758448,0.0001100974,0.005355207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962423,0.0003252079,0.000196408,0.000223697,0.0003740976,0.00007157293,0.00008524366,0.00003957256,0.002441929],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09237289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999436,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03218060730002027,"score_gpt":0.319291203083089,"score_spread":0.2871105957830687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}