{"id":"W322187415","doi":"","title":"The Oral Judgment Practice in the Canadian Appellate Courts","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Common law; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003542364,0.0002928285,0.0002521108,0.002871549,0.02316821,0.009739755,0.002587745,0.003036846,0.01287888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01301873,0.0005875828,0.0002826672,0.004729159,0.01139162,0.001470538,0.002896706,0.002852249,0.0008498491],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1439348,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899188,0.0007314488,0.0002914579,0.0007006169,0.006161752,0.002195818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878018,0.001770978,0.0007017832,0.0004804896,0.006341477,0.002903369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001053276,0.0001668354,0.03968587,0.0004633918,0.00003011154,0.003502046,0.1033015,0.001152201,0.002882077,0.4008913,0.197931,0.2498883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001767205,0.00006266279,0.06681085,0.0004940122,0.00003067656,0.0005999519,0.02763174,0.0008069425,0.0007500708,0.006264761,0.8963157,0.0002150254],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2850886,0.018368,0.002749102,0.07943641,0.001495142,0.0002537554,0.001298241,0.0002890491,0.6110218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9046659,0.004602556,0.002141199,0.005543827,0.0002050942,0.00003530694,0.0001909997,0.00004774465,0.08256734],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8524387,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01983593079110275,"score_gpt":0.3416818021330048,"score_spread":0.321845871341902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}